Using Benchmarks for SaaS Competitive Analysis: How to Position Against Rivals
Learn how to leverage industry benchmarks for competitive positioning. Discover frameworks for analyzing competitors, identifying advantages, and communicating differentiation.
Table of Contents
- Why Competitive Benchmarking Matters
- Types of Competitive Benchmarks
- Building Your Competitive Set
- Key Metrics for Competitive Analysis
- Data Sources for Competitor Benchmarks
- Framework for Competitive Positioning
- Using Benchmarks in Sales Conversations
- Communicating to Stakeholders
- Common Pitfalls
- Conclusion
Why Competitive Benchmarking Matters
Competitive benchmarking goes beyond internal performance metrics to understand how you stack up against rivals. This external perspective is crucial for strategic planning, positioning, and winning in the market.
Understanding your competitive position helps you:
- Identify genuine differentiation - What do you actually do better?
- Spot vulnerabilities - Where are competitors gaining ground?
- Guide product strategy - What gaps should you fill?
- Arm your sales team - How do you win competitive deals?
- Inform investors - How do you compare to the market?
Competitive Benchmarking Impact Areas
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Strategy ████████████████ Direct impact
Sales ██████████████░░ Win/loss analysis
Product █████████████░░░ Feature roadmap
Marketing ████████████░░░░ Positioning
Investor Comms ██████████░░░░░░ Market context
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Types of Competitive Benchmarks
Direct Performance Benchmarks
Metrics where you directly compare against specific competitors:
| Benchmark Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Product features | Feature parity, capability depth |
| Pricing | Price point, value per dollar |
| Market share | Revenue, customer count |
| Growth rate | Public companies, funding news |
| Customer satisfaction | G2/Capterra scores, NPS |
Category Benchmarks
How you compare against the category average:
| Benchmark Type | What It Measures |
|---|---|
| Average pricing | Your position vs market |
| Typical features | Table stakes vs differentiators |
| Standard SLAs | Industry expectations |
| Common integrations | Must-have partnerships |
Aspiration Benchmarks
Comparing against leaders you want to emulate:
Aspiration Benchmark Framework
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Current State Aspiration Target
───────────────── ─────────────────
Your NRR: 105% → Snowflake: 158%
Your GM: 72% → Atlassian: 83%
Your Growth: 60% → Monday.com: 85%
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Gap Analysis → Improvement Roadmap
Building Your Competitive Set
Primary Competitors
Companies you encounter most often in deals:
| Criteria | Definition |
|---|---|
| Deal overlap | >25% of competitive deals |
| Feature similarity | >70% capability overlap |
| Target market | Same ICP |
| Price range | Within 50% price differential |
Secondary Competitors
Adjacent solutions that occasionally compete:
| Criteria | Definition |
|---|---|
| Deal overlap | 10-25% of competitive deals |
| Partial overlap | Solve subset of same problems |
| Different segment | Similar product, different market |
Substitutes
Alternative approaches to solving the problem:
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Manual processes | Spreadsheets, email |
| In-house solutions | Custom development |
| Platform features | Built into larger platforms |
| Point solutions | Multiple tools combined |
Competitive Set Framework
Competitive Landscape Map
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Enterprise
│
┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
│ Comp A │ Comp B │
│ ○ │ ○ │
Low │ │ │ High
Price ├───────────────┼───────────────┤ Price
│ │ │
│ YOU │ Comp C │
│ ★ │ ○ │
└───────────────┼───────────────┘
│
SMB
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Key Metrics for Competitive Analysis
Product Metrics
| Metric | How to Benchmark | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Feature count | Feature matrix comparison | Product pages, trials |
| G2/Capterra score | Direct comparison | Review sites |
| Feature ratings | Category breakdown | Review sites |
| Integration count | Marketplace comparison | Integration pages |
| API capability | Documentation review | Developer docs |
Go-to-Market Metrics
| Metric | How to Benchmark | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Website traffic | Relative share | SimilarWeb, Semrush |
| Content output | Blog frequency, quality | Manual review |
| Social presence | Followers, engagement | Social platforms |
| Search rankings | Keyword positions | SEO tools |
| Event presence | Speaking, sponsoring | Event listings |
Business Metrics (where available)
| Metric | Source | Reliability |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Public filings, press releases | High (public) |
| Funding | Crunchbase, PitchBook | High |
| Employee count | Medium | |
| Growth rate | Funding news, press | Medium |
| Customer count | Press releases, case studies | Low-Medium |
Customer Metrics
| Metric | How to Benchmark | Source |
|---|---|---|
| NPS | Published data, surveys | Varies |
| Churn | Industry reports | Low reliability |
| Customer logos | Websites, case studies | High |
| Market segment | Customer analysis | Medium |
Data Sources for Competitor Benchmarks
Public Sources
Review Platforms
| Platform | Best For | Data Quality |
|---|---|---|
| G2 | Feature ratings, comparisons | High |
| Capterra | SMB software | High |
| TrustRadius | Enterprise software | High |
| Gartner Peer Insights | Enterprise buyers | High |
Traffic and SEO Tools
| Tool | Best For |
|---|---|
| SimilarWeb | Traffic estimates, sources |
| SEMrush | SEO, content strategy |
| Ahrefs | Backlinks, content |
| SpyFu | PPC strategy |
Business Intelligence
| Source | Data Available |
|---|---|
| Crunchbase | Funding, employees |
| PitchBook | Detailed financials |
| Employee count, growth | |
| Glassdoor | Culture, headcount |
Internal Sources
Win/Loss Analysis
Track competitive outcomes:
Win/Loss Tracking Template
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Competitor: [Name]
─────────────────────────────────────────────────
Win Rate vs Them: [___%]
Deals Encountered: [___] last quarter
Top Win Reasons:
1. _______________________
2. _______________________
3. _______________________
Top Loss Reasons:
1. _______________________
2. _______________________
3. _______________________
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Customer Feedback
| Source | Insight Type |
|---|---|
| Sales calls | Buying criteria |
| Support tickets | Feature gaps |
| Churn interviews | Competitive switches |
| NPS verbatims | Comparison mentions |
Framework for Competitive Positioning
Step 1: Map the Landscape
Create a competitive positioning matrix:
| Dimension | You | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price point | $$ | $ | $$$ | $$ |
| Target market | Mid-market | SMB | Enterprise | Mid-market |
| Key strength | Ease of use | Price | Features | Integration |
| Weakness | Scale | Depth | Complexity | Support |
Step 2: Identify Differentiation
Genuine differentiators vs table stakes:
Differentiation Analysis
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
True Differentiators Table Stakes
─────────────────── ──────────────────
○ Unique capability ○ Basic features
○ Superior performance ○ Standard integrations
○ Exclusive partnership ○ API access
○ Proprietary technology ○ Mobile app
○ SSO support
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Focus messaging on TRUE differentiators
Step 3: Quantify Advantages
Turn differentiation into numbers:
| Advantage | Metric | Your Performance | Competitor Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed | Implementation time | 2 weeks | 6 weeks |
| Support | Response time | 2 hours | 24 hours |
| Value | ROI achieved | 340% | 180% |
| Satisfaction | G2 score | 4.7 | 4.2 |
Step 4: Create Battle Cards
Structured competitive intelligence for sales:
Battle Card Structure
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
COMPETITOR: [Name]
─────────────────────────────────────────────────
Overview:
[Brief description of competitor]
Their Strengths:
• ________________
• ________________
Their Weaknesses:
• ________________
• ________________
How We Win:
• ________________
• ________________
Landmines (watch out for):
• ________________
• ________________
Key Objections & Responses:
Q: ________________
A: ________________
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Using Benchmarks in Sales Conversations
Discovery Questions
Use benchmarks to guide discovery:
| Benchmark Context | Discovery Question |
|---|---|
| Industry avg implementation: 6 weeks | "What's your timeline expectation for implementation?" |
| Average churn in category: 15% | "Have you had challenges with vendor turnover?" |
| Typical integration count: 15 | "How many tools do you need this to connect with?" |
Proof Points
Structure benchmark-based proof points:
Proof Point Formula
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
"Industry average is [X]. Our customers typically
see [Y], which is [Z%] better than average."
Example:
"The industry average for implementation is 6 weeks.
Our customers go live in 2 weeks on average, which
is 70% faster than the category norm."
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Competitive Objection Handling
| Objection | Benchmark Response |
|---|---|
| "Competitor is cheaper" | "Price per user is lower, but total value differs. Our customers see 2x faster time-to-value." |
| "Competitor has more features" | "Feature count doesn't equal value. Our G2 usability score is 4.8 vs their 3.9." |
| "Competitor is bigger" | "Size doesn't ensure success. Our NPS is 72 vs their 34, and our churn is 3x lower." |
Deal Benchmarking
Compare the prospect's situation to successful customers:
| Prospect Attribute | Benchmark | Relevant Case Study |
|---|---|---|
| Company size | 500 employees | Similar-sized wins |
| Industry | Healthcare | Healthcare references |
| Use case | Sales automation | Sales automation ROI |
| Integration needs | Salesforce + Slack | Comparable stack |
Communicating to Stakeholders
Board Presentations
Frame competitive position in context:
Competitive Position Summary
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Market Share: #3 of 8 major players (12% share)
Win Rate: 62% (up from 55% last quarter)
NRR vs Category: 112% vs 105% industry avg
G2 Ranking: #1 in Mid-Market category
Competitive Trend:
○ Gaining share against Comp A (SMB migration)
○ Holding against Comp B (enterprise)
○ New entrant Comp D emerging in vertical
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Investor Updates
Contextualize metrics with competitive benchmarks:
| Metric | Your Performance | Category Median | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth | 95% YoY | 65% YoY | 75th |
| NRR | 118% | 108% | 80th |
| Gross Margin | 78% | 72% | 70th |
Team Communications
Share competitive insights appropriately:
| Audience | Information Type | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Sales | Battle cards, win/loss | Weekly |
| Product | Feature gaps, roadmap intel | Monthly |
| Marketing | Positioning, messaging | Monthly |
| All hands | Market position summary | Quarterly |
Common Pitfalls
Pitfall #1: Cherry-Picking Metrics
Problem: Only highlighting metrics where you win.
Solution: Acknowledge weaknesses. Credibility comes from balanced analysis.
Pitfall #2: Outdated Intelligence
Problem: Using stale competitive data.
Solution: Regular refresh cycles:
| Data Type | Refresh Frequency |
|---|---|
| Pricing | Quarterly |
| Features | Monthly |
| Market position | Quarterly |
| Battle cards | Monthly |
Pitfall #3: Overcomplicating Analysis
Problem: Creating complex analyses no one uses.
Solution: Focus on actionable insights. A simple battle card used daily beats a detailed report read once.
Pitfall #4: Ignoring Substitutes
Problem: Only benchmarking against direct competitors.
Solution: Include "do nothing" and alternative approaches in analysis.
Pitfall #5: Competitor Obsession
Problem: Letting competitors drive your strategy.
Solution: Use competitive intelligence to inform, not dictate, decisions.
Healthy vs Unhealthy Competitive Focus
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
HEALTHY UNHEALTHY
─────────────────── ──────────────────
○ Inform strategy ○ Dictate strategy
○ Understand market ○ Copy competitors
○ Identify gaps ○ Feature matching
○ Win positioning ○ Obsess over moves
○ Quarterly reviews ○ Daily monitoring
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Conclusion
Competitive benchmarking transforms market competition from guesswork into strategy. By systematically tracking, analyzing, and acting on competitive intelligence, you can position your product effectively, arm your teams with insights, and communicate confidently to stakeholders.
Key takeaways:
- Build a clear competitive set - Primary, secondary, and substitutes
- Use multiple data sources - Public metrics plus internal intelligence
- Quantify differentiation - Turn advantages into numbers
- Enable your teams - Battle cards, not dusty reports
- Stay current - Regular refresh cycles
Use our SaaS Benchmark Dashboard to track your metrics against industry standards and identify where you have competitive advantages worth highlighting.
Remember: the goal of competitive analysis isn't to copy competitors—it's to understand the landscape well enough to chart your own winning path.
Written by
Emma ThompsonGrowth & Marketing Specialist
B2B marketing expert covering email, analytics, CRM, and marketing automation.
Tools Mentioned in This Guide
Browse all toolsRelated Comparisons
View all comparisonsRelated Guides
View all guidesNeed Help Building Your Stack?
Use our Stack Builder to get personalized recommendations
Build Your Stack